This site uses cookies. By continuing, your consent is assumed. Learn more

148.9fm shares

Naked facebook guys

opinion

SocialBeat has a very thoughtful piece urging Zuckerberg to be forthright and explain what he truly and genuinely believes about privacy. Zuckerberg must have skipped that class where Jung and Goffman were discussed. Individuals are constantly managing and restricting Naked facebook guys of information based on the context they are in, switching between identities and persona. This is how we navigate the multiple and increasingly complex spheres of our lives.

It is not that you pretend to be someone that you are not; rather, you turn the volume up on some aspects of your identity, Naked facebook guys tone down others, all based on the particular context you find yourself. Some social networks recognize this. Moli, for example, built its entire business model on the idea that users should Naked facebook guys able to manage their identity based on the audience.

See my comments on Moli here and here. Even Facebook allows this common and normal practice through the use of Limited Profiles which used to have greater functionality and use value. But, it seems Zuckerberg does not want people to be able to manage who gets to see what about them. One identity is all you have, all you deserve.

I can deal with the fact that we have completely different philosophies of information, privacy, and now, identity. At least I hope you are. Kieran Healy has a nice reflection herewhich includes this engaging passage:. There Naked facebook guys many different definitions of identity, not all of which make sense. I prefer the view that an identity is a set of assertions about yourself that you may lay claim to.

But in practice we expose different sets of claims depending on the circumstances. Nobody puts their membership in Alcoholics Anonymous on their CV. In the last 24 hours, this 4-year-old post has suddenly had over 60, page views and over 10, shares on Facebook.

Maybe Diaspora will Naked facebook guys it right. This is a much bigger issue than I think people even realize. Facebook is well on its way to becoming the very worst Fascist Orwellian nightmare. This is the slippery slope we all……whether gay, straight, black, white, tan, trans, etc. No one is forced to have a FB account. Just a bunch of whiners who need to get off the internet and do something productive. It seems that if you are a part of a website then you should be able to comment on Naked facebook guys you would or would not like from that website.

You are contributing content, your very presence is what makes it a draw for advertisers. One would think that Facebook would be interested in hearing what you think.

Naked Tattoo Guy, France. likes...

And for the social lives of social circles. People use Facebook and nothing else to invite people to birthday parties etc.

Mr Zuckerberg Is there any way of preventing posts from friends of friends?

View the profiles of people...

My wall is full of these posts. I totally agree with your comment! He can do what he wants with it. Just because they open their door to you does not give you the right to dictate how they run Naked facebook guys. Facebook is a community, but it is also a corporate business owned, made, and maintained by Mark Zuckerburg.

If he is a genocidal corporate fascist, then this is his genocidal corporate fascism community. If he decided that a minority should be removed from his genocidal corporate fascist society because they fail to reliably follow a rule he created for his genocidal corporate fascist community, then he is well within his rights.

News feed